Cargill is one of U.S.As largest corporations and you can find them on Forbes mags list of the top 20 biggest corporations. How did they got there? Well, it’ s definitely not an easy answered question. But if I sum it up I’d say by making sucessful business in areas such as agriculture. Or if you re-read my title for this post, “Nourishing ideas. Nourishing people“, you get the formula of sucess straight from the source since the quote is Cargills slogan.
Why am I even mentioning Cargill in my blog, a travel blog from my stay in Santarém, and what about the slogan!? When seeing the skyline of Santarém you are not, under any circumstances, able to miss the only 10 storey tall construction in the city. It’s a huge crane situated in the port right next to Tapajós. And that makes one curious. In a city almost without tall buildings you end up paying a lot more attention to the only crane around than, for example, when passing Empire state building in New York[1]. I asked some of my friends about the company and the purpose of the construction and what I got to know did certainly not satisfy my hunger for knowledge. Curiosity is what makes me go up in the morning so to say.
Allright, so with their slogan in mind let me take a local example of how Cargill’s nourishing people. Cargill owns large quantities of land here in Pará which they use to produce soy. Their plantages begins in the outskirts of Santarém and on my ride to Belterra I got to see their nourishing projects; on long distances of the ride there were no trees left and I got to see the beginning of what possibly would become a soy field. A catholic priest and founder of an educative radio station in the region called Edilberto Sena comments: “We´re not against soy itself; we´re against the methods Cargill uses when planting soy in our region.”. The effects of cutting down trees in this region, except for nourishing soy eaters, are hundreds (such as pigs in Europe which is the prime consumer). A couple worth mentioning are:
a). It’s ugly! Damn, you need to be a tasteless fool to consider trading rainforest for soya fields.
b). It has, and still is contaminating the river so that the fish and other creatures eventually dies. Nourish people point? At least I can’t see one here since the most eaten plate around is Tucunaré on of the local fishes.
c). The decrease of hunting possibilities for the locals due to less forest and, obviously therefore, less animals. It used to be common having meat every once in a while in the villages and now it’s rare. Damn, nourish people? Not in this neighbourhood.
d). Less abilities for small farms producing food people here actually eat since the soil get drained and it gets harder cultivating. Nourish point on this one? Sorry none.
e). F?*k it, i’m out. I blame it on my lack of alphabetical knowledge.
This is just the local effects of cutting down some rainforest. Add the global effects you’ve gotten showed down your throat since the age of 6 and you get the whole picture. The whole picture of how Cargill is nourishing ideas and nourishing people.
[1] Myself. If you’re digging the subject or get frustrated when reading check:
Wikipedia article on Cargill
Greenpeace report on the subject.
Check the word nourish in a dictionary and keep reading my blog.